This article discusses the safety contribution of a public administration scholar specialised in space policy, Howard McCurdy. Its aim is twofold. First, it contends that McCurdy’s research on NASA and (post) bureaucracy has been overlooked in the field whereas it provides a valuable lens to the understanding of reliability, safety and performance of safety–critical systems. This contention requires bringing to the fore McCurdy’ extensive study of NASA and his rationale over several decades. Second, the article argues that McCurdy’s research brings novel and valuable insights to important safety debates. Following a methodological section, the article explains his analysis of the engineering, organisational, and political complexities and challenges experienced by NASA’s employees over more than sixty years of the agency’s lifetime, developing a unique longitudinal and multilevel study of reliability, safety and performance. The relevance of McCurdy’s lens is then illustrated using SpaceX as a case study, an example of the new developments in organising space exploration with their safety related challenges, moving from public to private initiatives. In the discussion, the article explores the value of this author for past and contemporary debates on reliability, safety and performance of safety–critical systems. In “Reinterrogating the past”, it is argued that McCurdy’s research provides a bridge between what was once framed as two opposite theses, normal accident versus high-reliability organisation. In “challenging the present” it is argued that more recent debates and controversies triggered by the “new view” might not be as new as currently thought and advocated.